refugees in their own lands

By -
I worked for conservation the Philippines for about 7 years now. It is alarming that conservation activities have caused traditional owners become refugees in their own ancestral domain. It might be different here in the Philippines where we have the IPRA Law or the Indigenous People's Rights Act. IPRA enables these people to have their Certificate of Ancestral Domain like the case of the Tagbanua's in Coron and the highlanders in Mt. Guiting Guiting. They are protected from being evicted from their own ancestral domain that has been declared a national park.

But this is not true for all countries. There has been refugees of conservation.

In the name of "preserving biodiversity" large conservation organizations (with the help of The World Bank, governments, and corporate donors) have caused massive displacement and cultural genocide across six continents. Tens of millions of native people have so far been evicted from their traditional lands, many to languish in border town shanties.

But when exactly did human communities become incompatible with "nature?" And why exactly does 90% of all biodiversity lie outside those protected areas?


The big non governmental NGO are nicknamed BINGO...


It's no secret that millions of native peoples around the world have been pushed off their land to make room for big oil, big metal, big timber, and big agriculture. But few people realize that the same thing has happened for a much nobler cause: land and wildlife conservation. Today the list of culture-wrecking institutions put forth by tribal leaders on almost every continent includes not only Shell, Texaco, Freeport, and Bechtel, but also more surprising names like Conservation International (CI), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), and the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS). Even the more culturally sensitive World Conservation Union (IUCN) might get a mention.


read complete article here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mind haunts a place

By -
Image
There’s this residential area near the university that seems to be intimately linked with the present existence. Just like the university, this subdivision – with its blocks of sprawling houses and quiet gated streets – has its way of intruding into one’s consciousness. If there’s a sense in describing oneself as haunting a place even if one is still very much alive, this is exactly how one would feel upon coming to an awareness of such encroachment. It’s like slowly realizing that one has been a sort of prisoner all these years, that no matter how many miles one has flown away from a certain point of origin, one’s life will ultimately be pulled back to gravitate around a few significant places. Yet, there’s also this sense of being set free from some drab view of the past, and being made to see such places and everything on it in a totally different light. Such were the thoughts that flitted through a weary mind as it came across this tree along one of the subdivision’s main streets....
Read more

Managing protected areas

By -
The controversy surrounding the re-opening of Senator Juan Ponce Enrile's logging concession in Samar island in the Philippines has once again raised the issue of people's participation in the management of natural resources and how serious the government really is in implementing this policy. On the one hand, there is the recent legal move by provincial officials in Samar challenging the decisions of Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Secretary Mike Defensor to lift the logging moratorium and extend Senator Enrile's logging permit by 16 years. According to these local officials, Secretary Defensor failed to comply with the provision of the 1991 Local Government Code making proper consultation with communities and local governments mandatory for any project or activity that could impact on people's lives. On the other hand, Senator Enrile's logging concession lies within a protected area, the Samar Island Natural Park. Based on the National Integ...
Read more

The False Objectivity of “Balance”

By Roy C. Choco, FCD -
From Real Climate "We here at RC continue to be disappointed with the tendency for some journalistic outlets to favor so-called "balance" over accuracy in their treatment of politically-controversial scientific issues such as global climate change. While giving equal coverage to two opposing sides may seem appropriate in political discourse, it is manifestly inappropriate in discussions of science, where objective truths exist. In the case of climate change, a clear consensus exists among mainstream researchers that human influences on climate are already detectable, and that potentially far more substantial changes are likely to take place in the future if we continue to burn fossil fuels at current rates. There are only a handful of "contrarian" climate scientists who continue to dispute that consensus. To give these contrarians equal time or space in public discourse on climate change out of a sense of need for journalistic "balance" is as indefens...
Read more